Stewart Resnick, Governor Schwarzenegger, and Senator Diane Feinstein Collude to Destroy What Is Left of West Coast Salmon

The Water Bond: A Gift of Public Funds to Private Corporation

An $11.1 billion water bond was signed last year by Schwarzenegger.

April 17, 2010 in Water | Tags: $11.14 Billion water bond, Central Valley, illegally profits by selling water, Jared Huffman, No on water bond, November Ballot, Pistachio Farmer, Resnick, Water Bond, water bond opposition, water privatization, Westside Mutual Water Co. | by PCL Staff


This week, the Associated Press (AP) reported that a pistachio farmer in the Central Valley has filed a lawsuit alleging that the Westside Mutual Water Co. illegally profits by selling water to non-members. The Westside Mutual Water Co. is owned by billionaires Stewart and Linda Resnick, who control a 48 percent share of the publicly-funded Kern County Water Bank. In 2007, the Resnicks owned more than 755,868 acre-feet of water – twice the capacity of the massive Hetch-Hetchy reservoir that serves the city of San Francisco. Under California law, companies that sell water for a profit must register as public utilities and set rates with the oversight of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC); the Westside Mutual Water Co. is not registered with the PUC.
The AP report connected the lawsuit to a privatization clause included in the $11.14 billion water bond that will appear before voters this November. This clause would allow private companies to own water storage projects funded by the bond, essentially spending public funds to allow private companies to make profits on water. According to the report, Assemblymember Jared Huffman of San Rafael is considering introducing an amendment to remove the clause: “I don’t think anyone wants to see this become a gift of public funds to private corporations,” he said.
The privatization clause is one of many reasons why groups like the Planning and Conservation League, Sierra Club, and Food & Water Watch oppose the bond.


After spending another $750,000 on studies, Delta fish are still in trouble

March 22, 2010 | Lance Williams

It wasn’t sloppy science after all.

After spending $750,000 in taxpayers’ funds to assuage the suspicions of a grower with close ties to U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the National Academy of Sciences says that the Delta’s fisheries are in deep trouble, all right.

Restricting the pumping of irrigation water from the Delta to try and save the Sacramento River’s storied Chinook salmon run “is scientifically justified,” the academy also declared Friday.
Those are the key conclusions of a rush-job scientific reconsideration of the shocking collapse of the Delta’s aquatic ecosystem and the efforts of federal wildlife agencies to save it – even as farmers clamored for more water during a crippling drought.
Feinstein persuaded the Obama administration to order the study last fall, a week after billionaire grower Stewart Resnick – owner of Kern County’s Paramount Farms, and her friend and political contributor for more than a decade – complained that the save-the-fish program was worsening the recession in the hard-hit Central Valley.
Besides, Resnick argued in a letter to Feinstein, there was no obvious connection between the diversions of Sacramento River water for irrigation in recent years and the disaster in the Delta, where the annual Chinook salmon run had declined from 800,000 fish to 40,000 in only eight years. Smelt and sturgeon are also in a bad way.
The pumping restrictions were based on “sloppy science,” he wrote. It was likely that urban water pollution, global warming and other factors were the real culprits, he wrote.
Resnick may be the most politically influential grower in California.
He has donated $29,000 to Feinstein over the years and also given $246,000 to Democratic political committees during years when she sought re-election. He, his wife and executives of his companies have donated nearly $4 million to favored candidates and causes, most of them in the Golden State, California Watch has reported.
Corporate farmer calls upon political allies to influence Delta dispute
December 6, 2009 | Lance Williams
• Login or register to post comments
•
Wealthy corporate farmer Stewart Resnick has written check after check to U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s political campaigns. He’s hosted a party in her honor at his Beverly Hills mansion, and he’s entertained her at his second home in Aspen.
And in September, when Resnick asked Feinstein to weigh in on the side of agribusiness in a drought-fueled environmental dispute over the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, this wealthy grower and political donor got quick results, documents show.
On Sept. 4, Resnick wrote to Feinstein, complaining that the latest federal plan to rescue the Delta’s endangered salmon and smelt fisheries was “exacerbating the state’s severe drought” because it cut back on water available to irrigate crops. “Sloppy science” by federal wildlife agencies had led to “regulatory-induced water shortages,” he claimed. “I really appreciate your involvement in this issue,” he wrote to Feinstein.
One week later, Feinstein forwarded Resnick’s letter to two U.S. Cabinet secretaries. In her own letter, she urged the administration to spend $750,000 for a sweeping re-examination of the science behind the entire Delta environmental protection plan.
The Obama administration quickly agreed, authorizing another review of whether restrictions on pumping irrigation water were necessary to save the Delta’s fish. The results could delay or change the course of the protection effort.
To environmentalists concerned with protecting the Delta, it was a dispiriting display of the political clout wielded by Resnick, who is among California’s biggest growers and among its biggest political donors.
Resnick’s Paramount Farms owns 118,000 acres of heavily irrigated California orchards. And since he began buying farmland 25 years ago, Resnick, his wife, and executives of his companies have donated $3.97 million to candidates and political committees, mostly in the Golden State, a California Watch review of public records shows.
They have given $29,000 to Feinstein and $246,000 more to Democratic political committees during years when she has sought re-election.
“It is very disappointing that one person can make this kind of request, and all of a sudden he has a senator on the phone, calling up (U.S. Interior Secretary Ken) Salazar,” says Jim Metropulos, senior advocate for the Sierra Club.
Feinstein’s letter was “based on what she believes to be the best policy for California and the nation,” spokesman Gil Duran said in a statement. “No other factors play a role in her decisions.”
With the Valley’s economy battered by recession and drought, Feinstein believed it was important to reconsider the restrictions on pumping Delta water for irrigation, he said. Many farmers have urged such a review, he added.
In an interview, Resnick said he didn’t leverage his relationship with Feinstein to persuade her to intervene.
“Honestly, I’m not saying we could not have done that, but I don’t think that’s the way it happened,” he said. Feinstein long has had an interest in water issues, and “she just wanted to get to the bottom of this,” Resnick said.
A Troubled Estuary
The Delta provides drinking water for 20 million people and irrigation for the state’s vast agriculture industry. But after decades of water diversions, Delta fish populations are in catastrophic decline, scientists say.
Prodded by lawsuits from environmentalists, federal wildlife agencies commissioned scientific studies of the Delta’s ecological crisis. Based on the studies, the agencies launched a restoration program that curtailed pumping for irrigation and increased water flows for migrating fish.
Meanwhile three years of drought have forced big cuts in water allotments for farmers, and swaths of valley farmland lie fallow. The recession pushed the unemployment rate in some valley towns to 40 percent.
As a result, the restrictions on pumping Delta water became the target of a series of noisy protests that played out over the summer. Farmers and politicians blamed “radical environmentalists” – and the Obama administration – for ignoring the drought’s impact on the valley’s economy. “The government decided that the farmers come second and the delta smelt come first,” as Sean Hannity of Fox News put it on a visit to Fresno.
Farm groups filed 13 different lawsuits to overturn the restoration plans, arguing that climate change, urbanization, and discharges from sewers and factories are causing the Delta’s problems. One suit was filed in August by the Coalition for a Sustainable Delta, a non-profit founded by three executives of Resnick’s Paramount Farms. Resnick said he is “on the periphery” of the non-profit.
People familiar with Resnick’s political operation say Feinstein’s letter is a reminder of the power he can wield on water issues.
“Paramount Farms is a huge player,” says Gerald Meral, former director of the Planning and Conservation League environmental lobby.
“They are just way different from the average farmer – far more strategic” in their thinking, Meral says.
Wealth and Philanthropy
In Los Angeles, Resnick, 72, is known as one of the city’s wealthiest men and among its most generous philanthropists. He’s given $55 million to the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, millions more for a psychiatric hospital at UCLA and an energy institute at Cal Tech.
His wife and business partner, Lynda Resnick, is an entrepreneur, socialite and writer. Her 2008 marketing book, “Rubies in the Orchard,” had blurbs from Martha Stewart and Rupert Murdoch, and her “Ruby Tuesday” blog is sometimes featured on huffingtonpost.com. The couple live in a Beverly Hills mansion that writer Amy Wilentz called “Little Versailles.” It’s the scene of parties for celebrities, charities and politicians – governors, senators and presidential candidates.
Resnick said he worked his way through UCLA “washing windows,” and made his first million running a burglar alarm service. Since then, the couple’s Roll International holding company has profitably operated a long list of businesses: Teleflora florist wire service; POM Wonderful pomegranate juice; Franklin Mint, a mail-order collectibles firm; and FIJI bottled water, imported from the South Seas.
Underpinning their fortune is agribusiness – 70,000 acres of pistachios and almonds, 48,000 acres of citrus and pomegranates – most of it in Kern County at the south end of the San Joaquin Valley, and all requiring irrigation to survive.
Resnick said he makes political donations “without much real strategy,” other than to give to centrists from both parties. Water issues aren’t a major factor, he said.
Records show Resnick often contributes to politicians with power over the bureaucracies that make decisions affecting farming’s financial bottom line.
Since 1993, the Resnicks have given $1.6 million to California governors, key players in determining state water policy. Their donation pattern seems non-partisan, with the money following who’s in power.
In the 1990s, they gave $238,000 to Republican Gov. Pete Wilson, records show, although Resnick says he doesn’t recall giving to Wilson and doesn’t think he ever met him.
The Resnicks also backed the Democrat who replaced Wilson, Gray Davis. They gave Davis $643,000 and $91,500 more to oppose Davis’ recall in 2003.
With Davis gone, Resnick began donating to Arnold Schwarzenegger – $221,000, records show – plus $50,000 to a foundation that pays for the governor’s foreign travel.
Other big donations include $776,000 to Democratic political committees; $134,000 to agribusiness political committees and initiatives; and $59,000 to Republican committees.
Hedging Bets
The Resnicks have developed easy access to some of the politicians to whom they donate.
Schwarzenegger has called them “some of my dearest, dearest friends,” and like Feinstein, he has urged a review of the science behind the Delta restoration plan. Davis appointed Resnick co-chair to a special state committee on water and agriculture.
A more enduring benefit came during Wilson’s administration, when Paramount Farms gained part ownership of what was to have been a state-owned storage bank for surplus water.
As recounted in a report by the advocacy group Public Citizen, in the 1980s state water officials devised a plan to ease the impact of future droughts by collecting excess water during rainy years and storing it underground.
The water was to be pumped south via the California Aqueduct, then put into a vast aquifer in Kern County that could hold a year’s water supply for one million homes.
The state spent about $75 million to buy a 20,000-acre site and to design the water bank. But in 1994, state water officials transferred the water bank site to the local Kern County Water Agency in exchange for significant water rights, Resnick said. The water agency developed the water bank in partnership with four other public agencies and one private business – a subsidiary of Paramount Farms. Paramount wound up controlling a 48 percent share of the bank.
Resnick said the state had been unable to develop the water bank and gave up on the project. The local agencies and his company spent about $50 million to engineer the project and make the bank a success, he said.
Paramount’s control of the bank continues to infuriate some environmentalists. In recent dry years, the bank sold some of its stored water back to the state at a premium, Public Citizen reported.
“Resnick likes to call himself a farmer, but he is in the business of selling public water, with none of the profits returned to the taxpayers,” says Walter Shubin, a director of the Revive the San Joaquin environmental group in Fresno.
A supportive community
When she first emerged as a statewide candidate in the 1990 governor’s race,Feinstein made little headway in the Central Valley, and she was defeated by Wilson. After she was elected to the Senate two years later, Feinstein set out to befriend farmers.
Her attention to agriculture and water issues has paid off, says Dan Schnur, director of the Unruh Institute of Politics at USC and a former Wilson aide
“That community has been very supportive of her, much more for her than for most statewide Democrats,” Schnur says.
The Resnicks contributed $4,000 to Feinstein’s 1994 re-election campaign. When she ran again in 2000, they gave her $7,000. Resnick also donated $225,000 to Democratic political committees that were active in key Democratic races.
Resnick said he first got to know Feinstein personally 10 or 12 years ago because the senator also has a second home in Aspen.
In August 2000, when the Democratic National convention was in Los Angeles, the Resnicks hosted a cocktail party for Feinstein in their home. Among the guests were the singer Nancy Sinatra, then-Gov. Davis and former President Jimmy Carter, the Los Angeles Times reported.
In 2007, they gave $10,000 to the Fund for the Majority, Feinstein’s political action committee. In June, another committee to which Resnick has contributed, the California Citrus Mutual PAC, spent $2,500 to host a fundraiser for Feinstein, records show.
Feinstein also socializes with the Resnicks. Arianna Huffington, the blog editor and former candidate for governor, told the New York Observer in 2006 that she has pent New Year’s with Feinstein at the Resnicks’ home in Aspen. “We wore silly hats and had lots of streamers and everything,” she said of the party.
On Aug. 26, Feinstein met with growers and water agency officials in Coalinga, Fresno County. While there, she told the Fresno Bee that she wanted the U.S. Interior Department to reconsider the biological opinions underlying the Delta protection plan.
The following week, she received the letter from Resnick, which was first reported by the Contra Costa Times. She then sent her own letters to Interior Secretary Salazar and U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke. Days later, the administration agreed to pay $750,000 to have the National Academy of Sciences re-study the scientific issues underlying the Delta protection plan.
Last month, state lawmakers enacted a package of measures aimed at reforming the state’s outmoded water allocation system. The centerpiece – an $11 billion bond to build new dams and canals – must be approved by voters.
•
Lance Williams reported this story.
E-mail
This story was edited by Editorial
California Watch
A Project of the Center for Investigative Reporting
Environment Data Center
Follow us



Resnick and associates spend nearly $4 million on campaigns


December 6, 2009

Stewart Resnick, his wife, and executives of his companies have donated $3.97 million to candidates and political committees, mostly in the Golden State since 1993. Here are the recipients of contributions of $10,000 or more. You can sort by clicking on any of the column headers.

Recipient Campaigns Party Amount
DEMOCRATIC PARTY COMMITTEES INCLUDES DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE DEM $776,638
GRAY DAVIS GOVERNOR UNTIL 2003; LT. GOV.; CONTROLLER DEM $643,030
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER GOVERNOR REP $271,990
PETE WILSON GOVERNOR UNTIL 1998 REP $238,500
RICHARD RIORDAN LOS ANGELES MAYOR UNTIL 2001; INCLUDES BALLOT MEASURES REP $135,000
OPEN-PRIMARY INITIATIVE FAILED 2004 BALLOT MEASURE NP $150,000
AGRICULTURE PACS INCLUDES WESTERN GROWERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE NP $134,889
KATHLEEN BROWN FORMER STATE TREASURER; LOST 1994 GOVERNOR'S RACE DEM $118,437
JERRY BROWN ATTORNEY GENERAL; INCLUDES DONATIONS TO A CHARTER SCHOOL HE FOUNDED DEM $85,800
REPUBLICAN PARTY COMMITTEES INCLUDES REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE REP $59,276
FOSTER-CARE REFORM INITIATIVE PROPOSED STATE INITIATIVE NP $50,000
STEM-CELL-RESEARCH INITIATIVE BALLOT MEASURE PASSED IN 2004 NP $50,000
STEVE WESTLY LOST 2006 PRIMARY FOR GOVERNOR DEM $48,600
RECALL OPPONENTS FAILED MEASURE TO STOP RECALL OF GOV. DAVIS IN 2003 NP $91,500
ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA LOS ANGELES MAYOR DEM $41,500
JANE HARMAN CONGRESSWOMAN FROM LOS ANGELES DEM $37,900
DIANNE FEINSTEIN SENATOR FROM CALIFORNIA DEM $29,950
ED RENDELL GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA DEM $29,000
JAMES HAHN LOS ANGELES MAYOR UNTIL 2005 DEM $28,000
GAVIN NEWSOM SAN FRANCISCO MAYOR DEM $27,150
PHIL ANGELIDES TREASURER; LOST 2006 GOVERNOR'S RACE DEM $27,000
HILLARY CLINTON SECRETARY OF STATE, FORMER NEW YORK SENATOR AND PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE DEM $26,950
CLASS-SIZE-REDUCTION INITIATIVE STATE MEASURE PASSED 1998 NP $25,000
ARIANNA HUFFINGTON EDITOR-IN-CHIEF HUFFINGTON POST, CANDIDATE FOR GOVERNOR IN 2003 IND. $25,000
DON PERATA STATE SENATE LEADER; RETIRED IN 2008 DEM $25,000
BARACK OBAMA PRESIDENTIAL AND ILLINOIS SENATE CAMPAIGNS DEM $22,150
JOHN MCCAIN PRESIDENTIAL AND ARIZONA SENATE CAMPAIGNS REP $20,750
KEVIN DE LEON ASSEMBLYMAN FROM LOS ANGELES DEM $19,200
DARRELL STEINBERG SENATE PRESIDENT PRO TEMP, CALIFORNIA STATE SENATE DEM $18,600
GARY CONDIT CONGRESSMAN FROM CENTRAL VALLEY; DEFEATED IN 2002 DEM $17,700
BARBARA BOXER SENATOR FROM CALIFORNIA DEM $17,000
DAN LUNGREN CONGRESSMAN FROM SACRAMENTO; LOST 1998 GOVERNOR'S RACE REP $17,000
GIL GARCETTI LOS ANGELES DISTRICT ATTORNEY UNTIL 2000 NP $16,000
ROCKY DELGADILLO LOS ANGELES CITY ATTORNEY UNTIL 2009 DEM $15,200
PLANNED PARENTHOOD PAC FEDERAL AND STATE COMMITTEES NP $15,000
TOBACCO TAX INITIATIVE 1998 STATE BALLOT MEASURE NP $15,000
JIM COSTA CONGRESSMAN FROM FRESNO; FORMER STATE SENATOR DEM $14,950
BRAD SHERMAN CONGRESSMAN FROM LOS ANGELES DEM $13,650
ED MARKEY CONGRESSMAN FROM MASSACHUSETTS DEM $13,300
RUSTY AREIAS FORMER STATE SENATOR FROM LOS BANOS DEM $13,000
DEAN FLOREZ STATE SENATOR FROM BAKERSFIELD DEM $13,000
DENNIS CARDOZA CONGRESSMAN FROM MERCED; FORMER ASSEMBLYMAN DEM $12,800
CHUCK POOCHIGIAN FORMER FRESNO LAWMAKER; DEFEATED FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL IN 2006 REP $12,425
TOM HARKIN SENATOR FROM IOWA DEM $12,200
HENRY WAXMAN CONGRESSMAN FROM LOS ANGELES DEM $12,000
KEVIN MCCARTHY CONGRESSMAN FROM BAKERSFIELD REP $11,150
TOM LANTOS LATE CONGRESSMAN FROM SAN MATEO DEM $11,100
JOE BIDEN U.S. VICE PRESIDENT; FORMER SENATOR FROM DELAWARE DEM $11,000
HOWARD BERMAN CONGRESSMAN FROM LOS ANGELES DEM $10,900
CAL DOOLEY FORMER CONGRESSMAN FROM VISALIA DEM $10,250
MICHELA ALIOTO-PIER SF SUPERVISOR; LOST SECRETARY OF STATE RACE IN 2002 DEM $10,000
JOHN GARAMENDI CONGRESSMAN FROM THE EAST BAY, DEFEATED FOR GOVERNOR IN 1994, NOW RUNNING FOR CONGRESS DEM $10,000
JOHN KERRY SENATOR FROM MASSACHUSETTS; LOST PRESIDENTIAL RACE IN 2004 DEM $10,000
REDISTRICTING INITIATIVE STATE INITIATIVE PASSED IN 2008 NP $10,000
Sources: Federal Election Commission; California Secretary of State; California State Archives; San Francisco and Los Angeles ethics commissions; Pennsylvania Department of State.
Produced by Lance Williams, Agustin Armendariz and Lisa Pickoff-White
Within a week, Feinstein wrote to U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, dropping Resnick’s name and urging a new look at the science. Salazar promptly agreed.
The transaction dispirited environmentalists. They argued that another study was pointless, especially given that this latest save-the-Delta effort was only a few years old.
After its results were announced, the Environmental Defense Fund’s Ann Hayden told the San Francisco Chronicle, "We're looking forward to moving on from this whole fish vs. farm focus.”
But the urge to ridicule environmental-protection efforts that cost working people their jobs may be irresistible this election year.
There’s even a right-to-life angle, says GOP Senate candidate Carly Fiorina, the former Hewlett Packard executive who hopes to run against Sen. Barbara Boxer in the fall.
Boxer, like most state Democrats, took the environmentalists' side in the dispute.
“Isn’t it ironic that Barbara Boxer worked so hard to protect a 2-inch fish, but she can’t find it in her heart to protect the lives of the unborn?” the L.A. Times quoted Fiorina as saying.

Corporate farmer calls upon political allies to influence Delta dispute
December 6, 2009 | Lance Williams
• Login or register to post comments
•
Wealthy corporate farmer Stewart Resnick has written check after check to U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s political campaigns. He’s hosted a party in her honor at his Beverly Hills mansion, and he’s entertained her at his second home in Aspen.
And in September, when Resnick asked Feinstein to weigh in on the side of agribusiness in a drought-fueled environmental dispute over the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, this wealthy grower and political donor got quick results, documents show.
On Sept. 4, Resnick wrote to Feinstein, complaining that the latest federal plan to rescue the Delta’s endangered salmon and smelt fisheries was “exacerbating the state’s severe drought” because it cut back on water available to irrigate crops. “Sloppy science” by federal wildlife agencies had led to “regulatory-induced water shortages,” he claimed. “I really appreciate your involvement in this issue,” he wrote to Feinstein.
One week later, Feinstein forwarded Resnick’s letter to two U.S. Cabinet secretaries. In her own letter, she urged the administration to spend $750,000 for a sweeping re-examination of the science behind the entire Delta environmental protection plan.
The Obama administration quickly agreed, authorizing another review of whether restrictions on pumping irrigation water were necessary to save the Delta’s fish. The results could delay or change the course of the protection effort.
To environmentalists concerned with protecting the Delta, it was a dispiriting display of the political clout wielded by Resnick, who is among California’s biggest growers and among its biggest political donors.
Resnick’s Paramount Farms owns 118,000 acres of heavily irrigated California orchards. And since he began buying farmland 25 years ago, Resnick, his wife, and executives of his companies have donated $3.97 million to candidates and political committees, mostly in the Golden State, a California Watch review of public records shows.
They have given $29,000 to Feinstein and $246,000 more to Democratic political committees during years when she has sought re-election.
“It is very disappointing that one person can make this kind of request, and all of a sudden he has a senator on the phone, calling up (U.S. Interior Secretary Ken) Salazar,” says Jim Metropulos, senior advocate for the Sierra Club.
Feinstein’s letter was “based on what she believes to be the best policy for California and the nation,” spokesman Gil Duran said in a statement. “No other factors play a role in her decisions.”
With the Valley’s economy battered by recession and drought, Feinstein believed it was important to reconsider the restrictions on pumping Delta water for irrigation, he said. Many farmers have urged such a review, he added.
In an interview, Resnick said he didn’t leverage his relationship with Feinstein to persuade her to intervene.
“Honestly, I’m not saying we could not have done that, but I don’t think that’s the way it happened,” he said. Feinstein long has had an interest in water issues, and “she just wanted to get to the bottom of this,” Resnick said.
A Troubled Estuary
The Delta provides drinking water for 20 million people and irrigation for the state’s vast agriculture industry. But after decades of water diversions, Delta fish populations are in catastrophic decline, scientists say.
Prodded by lawsuits from environmentalists, federal wildlife agencies commissioned scientific studies of the Delta’s ecological crisis. Based on the studies, the agencies launched a restoration program that curtailed pumping for irrigation and increased water flows for migrating fish.
Meanwhile three years of drought have forced big cuts in water allotments for farmers, and swaths of valley farmland lie fallow. The recession pushed the unemployment rate in some valley towns to 40 percent.
As a result, the restrictions on pumping Delta water became the target of a series of noisy protests that played out over the summer. Farmers and politicians blamed “radical environmentalists” – and the Obama administration – for ignoring the drought’s impact on the valley’s economy. “The government decided that the farmers come second and the delta smelt come first,” as Sean Hannity of Fox News put it on a visit to Fresno.
Farm groups filed 13 different lawsuits to overturn the restoration plans, arguing that climate change, urbanization, and discharges from sewers and factories are causing the Delta’s problems. One suit was filed in August by the Coalition for a Sustainable Delta, a non-profit founded by three executives of Resnick’s Paramount Farms. Resnick said he is “on the periphery” of the non-profit.
People familiar with Resnick’s political operation say Feinstein’s letter is a reminder of the power he can wield on water issues.
“Paramount Farms is a huge player,” says Gerald Meral, former director of the Planning and Conservation League environmental lobby.
“They are just way different from the average farmer – far more strategic” in their thinking, Meral says.
Wealth and Philanthropy
In Los Angeles, Resnick, 72, is known as one of the city’s wealthiest men and among its most generous philanthropists. He’s given $55 million to the Los Angeles County Museum of Art, millions more for a psychiatric hospital at UCLA and an energy institute at Cal Tech.
His wife and business partner, Lynda Resnick, is an entrepreneur, socialite and writer. Her 2008 marketing book, “Rubies in the Orchard,” had blurbs from Martha Stewart and Rupert Murdoch, and her “Ruby Tuesday” blog is sometimes featured on huffingtonpost.com. The couple live in a Beverly Hills mansion that writer Amy Wilentz called “Little Versailles.” It’s the scene of parties for celebrities, charities and politicians – governors, senators and presidential candidates.
Resnick said he worked his way through UCLA “washing windows,” and made his first million running a burglar alarm service. Since then, the couple’s Roll International holding company has profitably operated a long list of businesses: Teleflora florist wire service; POM Wonderful pomegranate juice; Franklin Mint, a mail-order collectibles firm; and FIJI bottled water, imported from the South Seas.
Underpinning their fortune is agribusiness – 70,000 acres of pistachios and almonds, 48,000 acres of citrus and pomegranates – most of it in Kern County at the south end of the San Joaquin Valley, and all requiring irrigation to survive.
Resnick said he makes political donations “without much real strategy,” other than to give to centrists from both parties. Water issues aren’t a major factor, he said.
Records show Resnick often contributes to politicians with power over the bureaucracies that make decisions affecting farming’s financial bottom line.
Since 1993, the Resnicks have given $1.6 million to California governors, key players in determining state water policy. Their donation pattern seems non-partisan, with the money following who’s in power.
In the 1990s, they gave $238,000 to Republican Gov. Pete Wilson, records show, although Resnick says he doesn’t recall giving to Wilson and doesn’t think he ever met him.
The Resnicks also backed the Democrat who replaced Wilson, Gray Davis. They gave Davis $643,000 and $91,500 more to oppose Davis’ recall in 2003.
With Davis gone, Resnick began donating to Arnold Schwarzenegger – $221,000, records show – plus $50,000 to a foundation that pays for the governor’s foreign travel.
Other big donations include $776,000 to Democratic political committees; $134,000 to agribusiness political committees and initiatives; and $59,000 to Republican committees.
Hedging Bets
The Resnicks have developed easy access to some of the politicians to whom they donate.
Schwarzenegger has called them “some of my dearest, dearest friends,” and like Feinstein, he has urged a review of the science behind the Delta restoration plan. Davis appointed Resnick co-chair to a special state committee on water and agriculture.
A more enduring benefit came during Wilson’s administration, when Paramount Farms gained part ownership of what was to have been a state-owned storage bank for surplus water.
As recounted in a report by the advocacy group Public Citizen, in the 1980s state water officials devised a plan to ease the impact of future droughts by collecting excess water during rainy years and storing it underground.
The water was to be pumped south via the California Aqueduct, then put into a vast aquifer in Kern County that could hold a year’s water supply for one million homes.
The state spent about $75 million to buy a 20,000-acre site and to design the water bank. But in 1994, state water officials transferred the water bank site to the local Kern County Water Agency in exchange for significant water rights, Resnick said. The water agency developed the water bank in partnership with four other public agencies and one private business – a subsidiary of Paramount Farms. Paramount wound up controlling a 48 percent share of the bank.
Resnick said the state had been unable to develop the water bank and gave up on the project. The local agencies and his company spent about $50 million to engineer the project and make the bank a success, he said.
Paramount’s control of the bank continues to infuriate some environmentalists. In recent dry years, the bank sold some of its stored water back to the state at a premium, Public Citizen reported.
“Resnick likes to call himself a farmer, but he is in the business of selling public water, with none of the profits returned to the taxpayers,” says Walter Shubin, a director of the Revive the San Joaquin environmental group in Fresno.
A supportive community
When she first emerged as a statewide candidate in the 1990 governor’s race,Feinstein made little headway in the Central Valley, and she was defeated by Wilson. After she was elected to the Senate two years later, Feinstein set out to befriend farmers.
Her attention to agriculture and water issues has paid off, says Dan Schnur, director of the Unruh Institute of Politics at USC and a former Wilson aide
“That community has been very supportive of her, much more for her than for most statewide Democrats,” Schnur says.
The Resnicks contributed $4,000 to Feinstein’s 1994 re-election campaign. When she ran again in 2000, they gave her $7,000. Resnick also donated $225,000 to Democratic political committees that were active in key Democratic races.
Resnick said he first got to know Feinstein personally 10 or 12 years ago because the senator also has a second home in Aspen.
In August 2000, when the Democratic National convention was in Los Angeles, the Resnicks hosted a cocktail party for Feinstein in their home. Among the guests were the singer Nancy Sinatra, then-Gov. Davis and former President Jimmy Carter, the Los Angeles Times reported.
In 2007, they gave $10,000 to the Fund for the Majority, Feinstein’s political action committee. In June, another committee to which Resnick has contributed, the California Citrus Mutual PAC, spent $2,500 to host a fundraiser for Feinstein, records show.
Feinstein also socializes with the Resnicks. Arianna Huffington, the blog editor and former candidate for governor, told the New York Observer in 2006 that she has pent New Year’s with Feinstein at the Resnicks’ home in Aspen. “We wore silly hats and had lots of streamers and everything,” she said of the party.
On Aug. 26, Feinstein met with growers and water agency officials in Coalinga, Fresno County. While there, she told the Fresno Bee that she wanted the U.S. Interior Department to reconsider the biological opinions underlying the Delta protection plan.
The following week, she received the letter from Resnick, which was first reported by the Contra Costa Times. She then sent her own letters to Interior Secretary Salazar and U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke. Days later, the administration agreed to pay $750,000 to have the National Academy of Sciences re-study the scientific issues underlying the Delta protection plan.
Last month, state lawmakers enacted a package of measures aimed at reforming the state’s outmoded water allocation system. The centerpiece – an $11 billion bond to build new dams and canals – must be approved by voters.